Cage and Foucault: musical timekeeping and the security state

Research output: Book Chapter in Book

Abstract

This chapter examines John Cage's musical practice in terms of its ambivalent parallels with two techniques of power that Foucault, in his 1978 lectures, ‘Security, Territory, Population’, suggests should be distinguished from one another – 1) security and 2) discipline. I both develop and dispute Benjamin Piekut's application of Foucault's notion of discipline to the power dynamics inherent in Cage's practice. I highlight Foucault's attention to the differing ways in which discipline and security, as techniques of power, regulate time. And I argue that while Cage, in his 26'1.1499" for a String Player (1954), regulates time in a parallel manner to what Foucault calls discipline, in contrast, in the 1952 event at Black Mountain College, Cage utilizes a principle of aleatoric governance that instead provides a sonic and theatrical parallel to what Foucault calls security. This inconsistency in Cage's methods – within the same period – cannot be accounted for if we rely on the competing political metaphors – anarchistic or liberal – with which his work is usually described. Instead I argue that Cage's practice, like Foucault's tripartite analysis of mechanisms of power in Security, Territory, Population, encompasses multiple techniques of governance through its disparate approaches to musical timekeeping.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherManchester University Press
Number of pages19
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • security
  • discipline
  • Cage
  • Piekut
  • governance
  • aleatoric
  • aesthetic
  • liberal
  • anarchistic
  • regulate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cage and Foucault: musical timekeeping and the security state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this