Cultural Measurement on Whose Terms? Critical Friends as an Experiment in Participant-led Evaluation. In 'Making Culture Count. The Politics of Cultural Measurement'

Sophie Hope, Lachlan MacDowall (Editor), Marnie Badham (Editor), Emma Blomkamp (Editor), Kim Dunphy (Editor)

Research output: Book Chapter in Bookpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter explores an alternative approach to evaluating participatory public art projects involving the people that such projects seek to empower. It explains the concept of ‘critical friends’, the Critical Friends project and reflects on the findings of research carried out on two art commissions in North Greenwich, London, in the United Kingdom from 2008 to 2011. In the process of establishing a group of Critical Friends, participants became interviewers, researchers and evaluators, acting as ‘productive parasites’ to a process of socially-engaged, public art. Developed as an alternative approach to evaluation, the group sought to understand the qualitative experiences of other participants and to interrogate the motives, targets and politics of the commissions. Underpinning this inquiry are questions about the commissioning of participatory forms of art. Following an introduction to the context in which the Critical Friends project took place, the chapter goes on to focus on how the group reflected on the repeated or reluctant experiences of participation; their challenges to co-authorship; the uncertain relationship between the commissions and local democracy; and the shared, or not, sense of the absurd in the projects.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-137-46458-3
ISBN (Print)978-1-349-56539-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cultural Measurement on Whose Terms? Critical Friends as an Experiment in Participant-led Evaluation. In 'Making Culture Count. The Politics of Cultural Measurement''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this