Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Paradoxical leadership, athlete well-being, and performance satisfaction: The mediating role of the coach-athlete relationship

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Few studies have regarded coaches’ behaviour as two ends of a continuum in investigating their leadership. This study employed a continuum perspective, investigating the links between coaches’ paradoxical leadership, athlete well-being, performance satisfaction, and the coach-athlete relationship. A total of 279 athletes (male = 150, female = 129; Mage = 20.76, SD = 1.96) who engaged in various sports participated in this study, which required participants to complete an online, multi-section questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed for data analysis. The analysis indicated positive and significant paths (β ranging from .40 to .79) between paradoxical leadership and athlete well-being, performance satisfaction, as well as the coach-athlete relationship. The bootstrap approach suggested that the coach-athlete relationship explained the relationship between paradoxical leadership and athlete well-being as well as performance satisfaction (β ranging from .34 to .75; 95% CIs excluded the number zero). The results suggested that paradoxical behaviours have a significant role in supporting athletes, through which the coach could create a quality microenvironment with the athlete, contributing to both well-being and performance satisfaction. This study directly examined paradoxical leadership and its relationship with athletes’ outcomes, which has significant implications for the knowledge of fluctuations in leadership.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paradoxical leadership, athlete well-being, and performance satisfaction: The mediating role of the coach-athlete relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this